{"id":160,"date":"2007-11-07T10:47:41","date_gmt":"2007-11-07T10:47:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/integrativelearningcenter.org\/?p=160"},"modified":"2017-08-03T06:44:08","modified_gmt":"2017-08-03T06:44:08","slug":"0101-the-birth-of-osteoporosis-and-osteopenia-as-diagnoses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/integrativelearningcenter.org\/blog\/0101-the-birth-of-osteoporosis-and-osteopenia-as-diagnoses\/","title":{"rendered":"The Birth of Osteoporosis and Osteopenia As Diagnoses"},"content":{"rendered":"
In 1992, the World Health Organization (WHO) Study Group on Assessment of Fracture Risk and its Application for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis met and subsequently published their findings and recommendations.<\/strong> The major aim of the group was to evaluate available methods for the assessment of fracture risk and how those methods could be used in screening for osteoporosis.<\/p>\n Up to this point, the term osteoporosis was used without clear meaning. The official definition that was agreed upon by the study group was \u201ca disease characterized by low bone mass and micro\u2010architectural deterioration of bone tissue, leading to enhanced bone fragility and a consequent increase in fracture risk.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0 1<\/sup><\/p>\n It was further decided that four general diagnostic categories be formed for women based on the bone mineral density (BMD). There were:<\/p>\n The WHO indicates in this report that these values were being arbitrarily set, and that BMD is not a certain predictor of fractures. That is, an individual with a BMD of 2.5 SD below the reference will have an increased risk for fracture but will not invariably fracture. And conversely, someone with a low risk may sustain a fragility fracture. Nonetheless, the issues of better identifying \u201cat-risk\u201d individuals and promoting prevention and treatment plans were seen as highly important.<\/p>\n The WHO was alarmed that the aging population throughout the world was increasing putting an additional burden on health providers and economics since, with age, there is an increased demand for health services. Equally as concerning was the finding that hip fracture rates in some countries were not staying level but actually growing within the also increasingly aging population.<\/p>\n This 129\u2010page report went on to discuss the issues of fractures, diagnosis, bone quality, prevention and treatment in\u2010depth. However, for our purposes, the report stands as a marker for understanding the birth of the osteoporosis craze.<\/p>\n The National Osteoporosis Foundation lists these facts on their website2<\/sup>:<\/p>\n Here are a few experts that say yes:<\/p>\n \u201cI think even people who agree that osteoporosis is a serious health problem can still say it is being hyped. It is hyped.\u201d Mark Helfank, MD, MPH, MS of Oregon Health and Science University in Portland in a Washington Post quote of 2000. He goes on to say \u201cMost of what you can do to prevent osteoporosis later in life has nothing to do with getting a test or taking a drug.\u201d 3<\/sup><\/p>\n \u201cI rarely criticize drug companies, but in this case I have to say the publicity about osteoporosis is mostly about profits, not about women\u2019s health.\u201d Marcelle Pick, OB\/GYN NP on the Women to Women website.4<\/sup> Women to Women is the holistic clinic co\u2010founded by leading author and holistic OB\/GYN Christiane Northrup, M.D.<\/p>\n Dr. Nelson Watts, a leading expert in osteoporosis believes the term osteopenia should be eliminated. He feels alarming women in their 30s and 40s with a medical label that they can then worry about for the next 50 years, when most have normal bones is not helpful. \u201cBecause the term \u201costeopenia\u201d is not useful as a diagnosis and can actually be harmful, I am on a personal crusade to eliminated it from the bone density lexicon,\u201d shares Dr. Watts in \u201cWhat is osteopenia, and what should be done about it?<\/a>\u201d 5<\/sup> He further states that he try to avoid using the term with patients and instead opts for low bone density. \u201cwhich does not sound like a medical problem in and of itself, and (I hope) is a nonjudgmental term that should force the clinician to think about the clinical context.\u201d<\/p>\n Dr. Steven Cummings, also an expert, advices against the routine treatment of patients labeled with osteopenia. Most of these patients have a low risk for fracture and trials indicate that bisphosponate treatment for 4-7 years in this population has, at best, a small effect on fracture risk. Dr. Steven R. Cummings, of the University of California in San Francisco.<\/p>\n \u201cThere is no basis, no biological, social, economic or treatment basis, no basis whatsoever, for using minus one (referring back to the -1 SD point below the healthy adult mean BMD),\u201d Dr. Cummings said. \u201cAs a consequence, though, more than half of the population is told arbitrarily that they have a condition they need to worry about.\u201d 6<\/sup><\/p>\n Within most discussions on osteoporosis, one will find experts on both sides of the camp related to treatment and outcomes. The discussion remains quite robust and non-definitive.<\/p>\n It appears that most all agree that post-menopausal women with BMD results of -2.5 or greater should receive drug treatment when other fracture risk factors are present. Examples of other risk factors include family history, medical history, loss of height, and falls.<\/p>\n How should a client\/student proceed?<\/p>\n We, as Somatic Educators (Feldenkrais Method\u00ae<\/sup><\/em> practitioners, Bones for Life\u00ae<\/sup> Teachers, et al.) should not be in a position of influencing people to act against medical advice. Nor should we give the impression that what they have been told by their doctors may be faulty. Yet, we can empower our clients to talk with their doctor in-depth. We can give them an article or two to read and take with them to their doctor\u2019s appointment with questions in hand. This will allow a quality discussion. If they are unsure of what has been recommended, we can empower them to seek a second opinion. Even another physician specialty, such as an Endocrinologist could be helpful and may yield a different perspective than the Family Practitioner or Internist.<\/p>\n A great article for clients to read, formulate questions, and take with them to their doctor\u2019s visit is Dr. Watt\u2019s What is osteopenia, and what should be done about it?<\/a> It is a continuing education article written for physicians yet highly readable. Follow the link on the web and you can print out an on\u2010line copy at no charge. You can also reference our Issue 2 for a more comprehensive list of helpful articles.<\/p>\n By understanding the birth of the current osteoporosis craze, we can see that the WHO had a legitimate concern\u2026 increasing fragility fractures in an increasingly aging population. How the field has evolved since that time, shaped by technology, pharmaceutical companies, media, physicians, patients and fear is another matter and open to debate. We can agree that we all wish to age as healthy as possible and hope to live out our lives without diminished height, posture or broken bones.<\/p>\n Cynthia M. Allen<\/strong> is a Guild Certified Feldenkrais Practitionercm<\/sup> and Bones for Life\u00ae<\/sup> Teacher\/Trainer. She has a private practice in Cincinnati, Ohio. You can find out more about her and her practice at futurelifenow.com<\/a>. Cynthia Allen can be reached by email at CynthiaAllen@FutureLifeNow.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n References:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n
Current Statistics on Fragility Fractures<\/h3>\n
\n
Is Osteoporosis a disease that is being overdone?<\/h3>\n
What do the Experts agree upon?<\/h3>\n
In summary<\/h3>\n
\n\n